A practical, client-facing coverage map for the assessment areas supported by the Version 10 scripting direction: endpoint management, identity, security posture, Defender, apps, Windows servicing, legacy overlap, and recovery readiness.
The review is designed to identify where Microsoft endpoint and identity controls are secure, supportable, recoverable, and ready for production change.
Tenant configuration, enrollment restrictions, Autopilot profiles, Enrollment Status Page, scope tags, filters, RBAC, device categories, and core management design.
Device identity alignment across Entra ID, Intune, Autopilot, hybrid join, and stale or unmanaged device records.
Configuration profiles, Settings Catalog, endpoint security, security baselines, compliance, update rings, feature updates, and app targeting.
Global admins, privileged roles, eligible versus active assignments, PIM posture, MFA registration, guest users, stale users, enterprise apps, and OAuth consent.
Conditional Access policies, named locations, admin protection, break-glass exclusions, report-only policies, compliant device requirements, and unmanaged device access paths.
Secure Score control profiles, incomplete actions, quick wins, alternate mitigations, score impact, and business-prioritized remediation sequencing.
Defender incidents, alerts, onboarding gaps, AV, EDR, ASR, Firewall, BitLocker, tamper protection, LAPS, and endpoint security policy alignment.
Required apps, failed installs, ESP-blocking apps, Win32 dependencies, supersedence, app assignment conflicts, and enrollment delay drivers.
Update rings, feature update policies, quality update policies, driver update readiness, expedited updates, unsupported OS versions, and stale build versions.
Co-management assumptions, SCCM/MECM transition risks, GPO overlap, hybrid join dependencies, legacy scripts, and old management agent impact.
Ability to rebuild, re-enroll, secure, and validate endpoints after a disruption or security incident without restoring the same control-plane problems.
Executive summary, risk-ranked findings, quick wins, business impact, remediation effort, owner-friendly next steps, and 30/60/90-day sequencing.
This matrix connects the public service offering to the underlying assessment areas used by the Version 10 script and reporting model.
| Assessment Area | Examples Reviewed | Typical Finding Output |
|---|---|---|
| Intune control plane | Enrollment, Autopilot, ESP, RBAC, scope tags, filters, device categories | Management risk, admin exposure, enrollment design issues |
| Device identity | Intune devices, Entra devices, Autopilot identities, hybrid join, stale records | Duplicate device risk, unmanaged records, cleanup strategy |
| Policy and assignment sprawl | Compliance, configuration, Settings Catalog, endpoint security, baselines, update rings, apps | Conflicts, overlap, targeting drift, supportability risk |
| Entra ID and privileged access | Admins, PIM posture, MFA registration, guests, stale users, app consent, OAuth grants | Identity exposure, privilege risk, tenant hygiene gaps |
| Conditional Access and compliance | Admin policies, compliant device requirements, named locations, break-glass exclusions, report-only policies | Access-control gaps, unmanaged access paths, exclusion risk |
| Secure Score | Score history, control profiles, incomplete actions, high-value improvements, alternate mitigations | Prioritized security posture roadmap and quick wins |
| Defender and endpoint security | Incidents, alerts, onboarding, AV, EDR, ASR, Firewall, BitLocker, LAPS, tamper protection | Endpoint security gaps, detection posture, hardening priorities |
| Apps and ESP | Required apps, install failures, ESP-blocking apps, dependencies, supersedence, assignment mismatch | Autopilot delay/failure risk and app remediation sequencing |
| Windows servicing | Update rings, feature updates, driver updates, quality updates, OS build age, Windows 11 readiness | Migration readiness, servicing risk, outdated device groups |
| Legacy overlap | SCCM/MECM, co-management workloads, GPO overlap, hybrid join, legacy scripts and agents | Transition risk and modernization sequencing |
| Recovery readiness | Rebuild path, re-enrollment, Defender validation, BitLocker key escrow, break-glass, stale device cleanup | Recovery-to-controlled-state roadmap |
Findings are written for both executives and engineers. The purpose is to show what should be fixed first and why it matters.
Findings are ranked by potential business disruption, security exposure, operational impact, remediation complexity, and change risk.
The output is designed to give clients and partners a practical sequence: stabilize first, reduce risk next, then modernize and operationalize.
This coverage page gives prospects, MSPs, Microsoft partners, and security firms a clear view of what is reviewed without exposing raw script details or turning the website into technical documentation.
