Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Read-only evidence for machine coverage, onboarding, sensor health, device risk, software, vulnerabilities, security recommendations, incidents, and alerts where licensing and APIs permit.
Determine whether endpoint detection and response coverage is visible, governed, supportable, and aligned with the organization’s stated security model—without changing devices or tenant configuration.
The review does not assume every client uses Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and does not require access to third-party vendor APIs.
Read-only evidence for machine coverage, onboarding, sensor health, device risk, software, vulnerabilities, security recommendations, incidents, and alerts where licensing and APIs permit.
Client-supplied coverage, governance, ownership, integration, response, exception, retention, and operational evidence. No CrowdStrike or other vendor API access is requested.
Document the control gap, affected platforms, compensating controls, business exposure, ownership, and a prioritized path toward approved endpoint detection and response coverage.
Inventory, last-seen status, onboarding state, platform, sensor health, risk, exposure, and device-group visibility.
Available vulnerability, software inventory, exposure, and remediation-priority evidence from approved read-only APIs.
Configuration and remediation recommendations organized into accountable, risk-ranked actions.
Graph Security incident and alert themes within the approved lookback period. Zero records are reported as valid evidence, not treated as collection failure.
The Microsoft path supports delegated or application-certificate access. Requested permissions are disclosed before collection and must be approved by the client.
The approved source returned usable evidence and the collection completed without a material issue.
Some datasets were collected while others were limited by API availability, licensing, permissions, scope, or provider readiness.
The source could not be assessed. The reason and affected conclusions remain visible in the report.
Governance or third-party evidence was supplied by the client and remains subject to owner validation and supporting documentation.
Findings are mapped to applicable Microsoft guidance, Zero Trust principles, CIS Controls, and NIST CSF categories where appropriate. Mappings organize evidence and recommendations; they do not certify the environment or replace incident response, penetration testing, or a managed SOC.
We will confirm the provider, access model, available evidence, assessment boundary, and fixed-scope deliverables before collection begins.